For a few weeks now, Apple has been considering selling its new smartphone, the iPhone 12 , without a charger in the box. The arguments are cost savings and making a more sustainable product. Now it seems that Samsung, another giant in the industry, could join them in saving costs with 5G .
The integration of 5G is causing a headache for smartphone manufacturers, as they do not fit into current boxes and would have to change to a larger format. This would mean an expense in materials, shipping and storage in stores. On the one hand, they want to keep the price of their products under control. On the other, they have to please users who cannot conceive of a high-end terminal without the best connectivity options .
We saw this, for example, with the new Xiaomi and the latest generation of Samsung with 5G that surprise many due to their high price. Thus, while the inexorable technological advance causes the prices of the components to drop, companies will choose to eliminate an essential element for using the product: the charger .
The official discourse we see may possibly have more to do with the environmental factor, a powerful argument without a doubt. And it makes us wonder if it makes sense that 1.5 billion smartphones sold each year come with a charger. Especially if we take into account that we almost have a standard (USB-C for almost all, Lightning for Apple). A priori, eliminating them would ruce electronic waste by millions of tons, forcing us to “recycle” the ones we already have.
Remove the charger to benefit the user?
New phones come with fast charging which cannot be us with chargers from other devices or low-cost alternatives. Or worse, using a non-original charger can degrade the battery in the mium and long term.
The alternative they want is to sell the terminals with the option of including or not the charger . In this way, the user who already has. Wne can save on the price (and, in the process, check whether the cost is really ruc). And both the economic and environmental arguments are strengthene The problem is the huge logistical expense that this would lebanon telegram data entail, in a globaliz world that, increasingly, is betting on the standard for everyone.
To what extent does
The charger represent a significant part tour of jamaica houses of the cost of manufacturing a smartphone? How will users know if the final price of the device has been red cg leads uced for that reason? the definitive commitment to wireless charging? What consequences can there be from charging a smartphone with a charger that is not the official one? Will warranties be covered?
An uncertain future is seen for decisions that, if confirmed, will generate controversy and debate.